Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types #41956

Conversation

pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro commented May 9, 2024

Details

This PR aims to add descriptions for every Onyx type and property in the codebase. It also add a ESLint rule to enforces every Onyx type and its properties to have a comment explaining its purpose.

As discussed here, QBO and Xero typings will be handled in a follow up issue.

Fixed Issues

$ #39129
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

N/A

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

N/A

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

N/A

Android: mWeb Chrome

N/A

iOS: Native

N/A

iOS: mWeb Safari

N/A

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

N/A

MacOS: Desktop

N/A

src/pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/BankAccount.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/BankAccount.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/BankAccount.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/BlockedFromConcierge.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Fund.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/IOU.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
name: string;
};

/**
* Data imported from QuickBooks Online.
*/
type QBOConnectionData = {
/** TODO: I think this value can be changed to `ValueOf<CONST.COUNTRY>` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting comment here for me to get back to this later.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's test it or leave as it is

src/types/onyx/Policy.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/WalletOnfido.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall a massive improvement, let's aim to get rid of all TODOs in the code and have some internal eyes on the PR 🙌

src/types/onyx/WalletAdditionalDetails.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/TransactionViolation.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/TransactionViolation.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/TransactionViolation.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/TransactionViolation.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Transaction.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Transaction.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/Response.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ReportUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/settings/Wallet/ExpensifyCardPage.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro changed the title [TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types [No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types May 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Almost LGTM, let's aim to remove all TODOs by either removing the properties or adding minimal context on them.

isSender?: boolean;

/** TODO: I think this type could be changes to `IOUType` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try it then 👍

Comment on lines 219 to 223
/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
managerEmail?: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
parentReportActionIDs?: number[];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can remove these fields

text?: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not used in the app, let's remove

Comment on lines 60 to 64
/** TODO: Only used in tests */
whisperedTo?: number[];

/** TODO: Only used in tests */
reactions?: Reaction[];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's used in src/libs/ReportActionsUtils.ts, let's add the context for these props

Comment on lines 177 to 181
/** TODO: not enough context, seems to be used in tests only */
automatic?: boolean;

/** TODO: Not enough context, seems to be used in tests only */
shouldShow?: boolean;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm pretty sure we could remove both, but it would take a lot of refactor in ReportUtils.ts and tests. How about marking these as @depracated with explanation?

@@ -169,25 +192,52 @@ type ReportActionBase = OnyxCommon.OnyxValueWithOfflineFeedback<{
/** The user's ID */
accountID?: number;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's remove if it's not used, same for other TODOs like this

Copy link
Contributor

@fabioh8010 fabioh8010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking real good, but there are still many properties with TODOs, let's solve them

  • Confirming if they need to be there or just remove them
  • For the testing properties, remove TODO word and make it clear is used for testing purposes
  • For the ones that could be a different type, either test it or leave as it is

src/types/onyx/IOU.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/types/onyx/IOU.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
type OriginalMessageApproved = {
actionName: typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.APPROVED;

/** TODO: I think the type should match the scructure of `originalMessage` in `buildOptimisticApprovedReportAction` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's test this or if not possible, leave unknown

type ReimbursementDeQueuedMessage = {
/** TODO: I'd replace this type with `ValueOf<typeof CONST.REPORT.CANCEL_PAYMENT_REASONS>` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you test this?

Comment on lines 230 to 249
/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
edits?: string[];

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
childReportID?: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
isDeletedParentAction?: boolean;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
flags?: Record<FlagSeverityName, FlagSeverity[]>;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
moderationDecisions?: Decision[];

/** TODO: Only used in tests */
whisperedTo: number[];

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
reactions?: Reaction[];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's confirm if they have some purpose or just remove from the App, expect whisperedTo (change the comment to remove TODO)

Comment on lines 460 to 474
/** TODO: I think this type could be changed to `ValueOf<typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONABLE_MENTION_JOIN_WORKSPACE_RESOLUTION>` */
/** What was the invited user decision */
choice: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
email: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
inviterEmail: string;

/** TODO: Only used in tests */
lastModified: string;

/** TODO: Doesn't exist in the app */
policyID: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same for the TODOs, confirm to remove the unused, remove TODO word from testing ones

transactionID: string;

/** TODO: Only used in tests */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove TODO word from testing ones

type OriginalMessageReimbursementDequeued = {
actionName: typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.REIMBURSEMENT_DEQUEUED;

/** TODO: I think this type should be `ReimbursementDeQueuedMessage` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either test it or leave as it is

Comment on lines 213 to 229
type TaxCode = {
/** TODO: Not used in app */
totalTaxRateVal: string;

/** TODO: Not used in app */
simpleName: string;

/** TODO: Not used in app */
taxCodeRef: string;

/** TODO: Not used in app */
taxRateRefs: Record<string, string>;

/** TODO: Not used in app */
/** Name of the tax code */
name: string;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nothing is used here? Is this type even being used at all?

name: string;
};

/**
* Data imported from QuickBooks Online.
*/
type QBOConnectionData = {
/** TODO: I think this value can be changed to `ValueOf<CONST.COUNTRY>` */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's test it or leave as it is

@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cead22 do you know anyone that can help by providing descriptions to the remaining Xero and Quickbooks online type declarations? Thanks 🙌

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

hayata-suenaga commented Jun 4, 2024

For properties in Policy that are related to QBO and Xero, I can add comments to them in a follow up PP as discussed here

Issue created -> #43033

…-remaining-onyx-types

# Conflicts:
#	src/types/onyx/OriginalMessage.ts
#	src/types/onyx/Transaction.ts
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro changed the title [No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types [WIP][No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types Jun 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@fabioh8010 fabioh8010 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pac-guerreiro There are still TODOs on these three files, let's get them done and open the PR asap

Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 19 53 52

@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ function isActionableJoinRequest(reportAction: OnyxEntry<ReportAction>): reportA
*/
function isActionableJoinRequestPending(reportID: string): boolean {
const sortedReportActions = getSortedReportActions(Object.values(getAllReportActions(reportID)));
const findPendingRequest = sortedReportActions.find((reportActionItem) => isActionableJoinRequest(reportActionItem) && reportActionItem.originalMessage.choice === '');
const findPendingRequest = sortedReportActions.find((reportActionItem) => isActionableJoinRequest(reportActionItem) && reportActionItem.originalMessage.choice === '' as ValueOf<typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONABLE_MENTION_JOIN_WORKSPACE_RESOLUTION>);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets create a type for ValueOf<typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONABLE_MENTION_JOIN_WORKSPACE_RESOLUTION> and use it here.

if (!isActionableWhisper && (!ReportActionsUtils.isActionableJoinRequest(action) || action.originalMessage.choice !== '')) {
if (
!isActionableWhisper &&
(!ReportActionsUtils.isActionableJoinRequest(action) || action.originalMessage.choice !== ('' as ValueOf<typeof CONST.REPORT.ACTIONABLE_MENTION_JOIN_WORKSPACE_RESOLUTION>))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here.

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro changed the title [WIP][No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types [No QA][TS Migration] Add comments for remaining properties in Onyx types Jun 7, 2024
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2024 17:11
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2024 17:11
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from getusha and removed request for a team June 7, 2024 17:11
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 7, 2024

@getusha Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pac-guerreiro Thank you very much, this must have been hard to put together. I am going to merge this now to avoid conflicts but please address my comments in a new PR

amount: number;

/** Optional comment */
comment?: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB: I think the comment is optional so it can be an empty string but the property would be returned always

Suggested change
comment?: string;
comment: string;

decision: DecisionName;

/** When was the decision name */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** When was the decision name */
/** When was the decision made */

/** Currency of the approved expense amount */
currency: string;

/** Report ID of the expense */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we have to be a bit careful with use of expense / expense report. Expense = transaction and you can have a transaction thread.

In this case the report action refers to the expense report so we should make it clear to remove any doubts

Suggested change
/** Report ID of the expense */
/** Report ID of the expense report*/


/** Content of the original message */
originalMessage: {
/** Approved expense amount */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** Approved expense amount */
/** Approved expense report amount */

/** Approved expense amount */
amount: number;

/** Currency of the approved expense amount */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** Currency of the approved expense amount */
/** Currency of the approved expense report amount */

type TransactionViolation = {
/** Type of transaction violation ('violation', 'notice', 'warning', ...) */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets add these into CONST to get stricter here

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Jun 7, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@mountiny mountiny removed the request for review from getusha June 7, 2024 20:51
@mountiny mountiny merged commit 5297302 into Expensify:main Jun 7, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 7, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.81-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants